Показаны сообщения с ярлыком car reviews. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком car reviews. Показать все сообщения

RoadandTrack.com’s First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1


2009 Chevy Corvette ZR1. All Photos by Marc Urbano

Check out Shaun Bailey’s article on the 2009 Corvette ZR1:
“This is not a happy day for other exotic-car owners. The $103,000 super Vette, the ZR1, is out. Its 638 horsepower was unleashed on a select group of journalists at GM’s Milford proving grounds near Detroit for a controlled drive. A testament to the ZR1’s civility and balance is the fact that no one crashed, although a few orange cones were sacrificed to Jake. Who’s Jake, you ask? He’s the evil-eyed skull mascot for Badboy Vettes that’s emblazoned on the C6.R racer and has made his first appearance on a production Corvette, worn proudly on the ZR1’s intake ducting.

Rather than see journalists jeopardize their driver’s licenses by letting Jake out onto the street, GM had us drive their new baby around what is commonly referred to as the Lutz ring — a technical track whose corners simulate those from great circuits the world over. The focus is testing driveability. Most notable is the bowl-turn that simulates the Nürburgring’s famous carousel.

Check out the Corvette ZR1 Video and The Slideshow

For our limited drive, we were kept off the bowl and our speeds were hampered by a mid-course cone chicane. Even so, our top speed was well above 100 mph and nearly the entire track could be done in 3rd gear. With the massive twist of 604 lb.-ft. of torque on tap, it behooved us to avoid dropping to 2nd gear, except for the slowest of corners.


2009 Chevy Corvette ZR1 Speedometer

As expected, the supercharged LS9 superbly blends the Z06’s raucous LS7 with the smoothness of the modern LS3. At idle there is only a hushed V-8 warble, yet get to 3000 rpm with intent and a pleasant snarl emanates. Knowing that there is an extra 133 horsepower on tap, beyond the already terror-instilling Z06’s 505, I worked my way up to applying full throttle. Surprisingly, the ZR1 is far superior to the Z06 in driveability, refinement and speed.

Everything we gripe about in the Z06 — aside from the unsupportive seats — has been remedied. The twitchy rear end is gone, thanks to Magnetic Ride Control that allows for softer springs and heavier anti-roll bars. At times on the track I’d think, If I were in a Z06, I’d never go flat over this rise, but in the ZR1 the confidence and road-holding abilities are there.”


2009 Chevy Corvette ZR1

More at RoadandTrack.com



Related posts:



Related posts:



Reader Review of the Week

Consreviews_2_1

This week our winner was an easy choice. In the history of our award-less award we haven’t found a more thorough review than Chance of Indiana’s take of the 2007 Honda Civic Hybrid. The really cool thing about Chance’s report is that he had a 2003 Civic Hybrid and details the difference in the two models in a number of criteria and he does so in an exact manner. You can read Chance’s full review below and if you want to write a review of your own car you can go here.

2007civichybrid

"I've had my new 2007 Civic Hybrid for 2 weeks. Here are my first impressions.

Background: My previous car was a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid automatic.
Age: 4.5 years, 60K miles.
Total average mpg: 43.5.
Living area: Indiana (moderately cold winters, moderately hot/humid summers.)
Driving: 60% city, 40% highway. Driving style: conservative.

Compared to the previous Hybrid, the new 2007/2006 model offers these changes:

  • 1. Front and side view is slightly better. Rear view is slightly worse. (I don't think they can make that rear window any smaller). It has more airbags for side impact.
  • 2. More taut handling than before. (Or perhaps my 2003 was aging). Seems to handle "rippled road" defects somewhat better (where the older model could be punishing to front seat occupants).
  • 3. Automatic has better acceleration. I never test drove the 2003 manual 5-speed, but this is no longer offered.
  • 4. Seems to get somewhat better high-speed, high-wind (70mph) fuel economy. The 2003 model loses out in aerodynamics to the new model.
  • 5. Positive instrumentation changes: Pure digital readout of speed, supports mph and kph, produces more information (e.g. explicit readout for oil replacement).
  • 6. Negative instrumentation changes: Older model had explicit rotary settings for types of ventilation, while the new model uses a single "mode select" button with a screen display. The new approach requires taking your eyes off the road, whereas the older one allowed you to "set by touch."
  • 7. The fuel-economy (mpg) readout tends to report a little low (by about 4%), whereas my older 2003 model tended to read notably too high (by about 8%). I do appreciate that the new car reports .1 mpg increments, whereas the older one only reported .4 mpg increments.
  • 8. The tank on the new car is smaller (12.3 gal vs 13.2 gal), which cuts down a bit on the overall cruising range of the new Hybrid. This may not seem like an issue for the moment, but when the "late 1970s gas lines" return later this decade, losing the extra gallon means we'll be stuck waiting for gas more often... but not nearly as often as the SUV owners !
  • 9. Having only filled the tank twice, it is really premature to report on the fuel economy of the 2007 Hybrid vs the 2003. But I was pleasantly surprised by the new numbers."


Related posts:



Related posts: