Показаны сообщения с ярлыком mazda. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком mazda. Показать все сообщения

The Cheapest Import Hatchback Your 1978 Dollars Could Buy: Mazda GLC [Classic Ad Watch]


$3,480 sounds cheap, but the '78 Chevette Scooter went for $2,999. Still, the Mazda GLC was a good deal. Can you imagine a carmaker using the word "little" in their marketing today?



Related posts:



Related posts:



Happy Birthday Felix Wankel: How Does the Rotary Engine Work, Anyway?


All the major parts of the Mazda RX-8 Renesis engine disassembled.

Today in history - Felix Wankel, the inventor of the Wankel rotary engine, was born. I’m a Wankel freak. I love Wankel rotary engines, I think they’re one of the most beautiful mechanical devices of all time. Call me a geek, call me a weirdo…whatever, I love it when you talk dirty.

When I was young, I saw the innards of an old, junked Mazda Cosmo at my fathers salvage yard. I heard about this crazy motor out in the yard and decided to check it out; I knew the basics of how piston engines worked, and figured this strange thing would be pretty fun to mess around with. But sitting there, with it’s seals broken and rotors immovable, it blew my mind. It was just an oval with a triangle in it. That’s it. I had no idea how it worked or how it moved or anything. How could this thing power a car?


The Mazda Cosmo was the first 2-rotor rotary engine powered car.

So I looked up and read everything I could find about Wankel engines and about Felix Wankel, and that really blew my mind. The Wankel engine has basically one moving part, and it just spins. And it has a higher power to weight ratio than any traditional engine.

So why aren’t more automakers producing Wankel powered cars?
Because they already have a motor that works. The traditional piston engine does it’s job well, and these are hefty multi-billion dollar companies. It would be near impossible to steer these behemoths away from something that works and towards some weirdo engine with a cult following.

As I read about the rotary engine, I learned that the inside chamber isn’t an oval, it’s an epitrochoid. And the triangle rotor isn’t just a triangle, it’s what’s called a curve of constant width, or a Reuleaux polygon. Wankel engines are serious business. Instead of just a cylinder inside another cylinder, which is a very primal design for humans, the Wankel is pure simplicity via mathematical precision.

This is why most mechanics and engineers who understand Wankel engines are so enamored with them. They appeal to mechanically minded people because they’re such an elegant solution to a complex problem. Instead of having three separate pistons and all the bits associated with them, the rotary engine just has a triangle rotor, and each side works as a combustion chamber. It just spins. Quiet, harmonious, elegant spinning.

In contrast to the Wankel engine, the piston engine has a veritable army of moving parts. Cylinders, connecting rods, crankshafts, timing belt, camshaft, rocker arms, valves. There are countless little bits and pieces flickering away under the hood of the average car, creating that violent shaking. Meanwhile, the Wankel just spins around the eccentric shaft. That’s the only moving part. Really.


A Wankel rotor with the apex seals and side chamber seals removed and displayed.

The common objections to Wankel engines are ‘fuel efficiency’ and ‘reliability’, and those issues really just boil down to one thing, the seals. The combustion chambers inside the Wankel are constantly moving, so the seals (the apex seals and the seals against the chamber ends) are of major importance. Those are problems, not huge ones, but problems nonetheless. They’re nothing that a few years of competing automotive firms couldn’t fix, though.

You have to realize that Wankel’s are still on the fringes, despite the RX-7s and RX-8s, they’re essentially ignored by everyone else. They never really had a chance to get the kinks worked out by competition. Competition gets lots of minds working on the same problems, and that’s how you get real progress.

But, the first step in trying to change something is education. So, in honor of Felix Wankel’s 106th birthday today, August 13th, 2008; let’s get educated.

How it works:


And illustrated example of the Wankel engine in action.

Just about all internal combustion engines today are four-stroke engines. The four strokes are intake, compression, combustion and exhaust.

A traditional piston engine performs them all in each piston. The piston moves down, a camshaft opens the intake valve, and the air/fuel mixture gets sucked in. The piston moves up, compressing the mixture into a very small space. The spark plugs fire, creating combustion, which pushes the piston downwards, creates the force that moves the car; and turns the camshaft, which opens the exhaust valve. Lots of moving parts, still pretty simple. But that cycle takes place separately in each cylinder.

In a Wankel rotary engine, on the other hand, each side of the triangular rotor acts like a cylinder in a piston engine. As one side of the rotor is sucking in the air/fuel mixture, the other side is compressing another air/fuel mixture and getting ready for combustion; and the third side is expelling the exhaust from combustion that has already happened in that chamber. As the rotor moves, it closes off the intake or exhaust port, making camshafts and valves irrelevant. A Wankel engine car with two rotors (3 sides on each rotor = 6 sides or 6 combustion chambers) is equivalent to a traditional V6 car (6 cylinders = 6 combustion chambers).

It sounds complicated, but it’s not really. If you’re still having problems visualizing it, this should offer some clarification:

So, it’s a badass machine. It’s beautiful, it’s elegant, and it works perfectly. Hopefully Mazda will keep the dream alive and keep producing cars in their RX series, like the awesome 2009 Mazda RX-8. Thanks Felix.

Felix Wankel was born in Lahr, Germany in 1902. He never went to college, never got a degree in engineering, and was never even able to become an engineers apprentice. He taught himself engineering and was able to put together the first prototype Wankel rotary engine in the mid 1950s.
Happy Birthday.



Related posts:



Related posts:



The Top 10 Most Toxic Cars

A report released yesterday by a Michigan-based non-profit environmentalist group, the Ecology Center, ranked the interior air quality of about 450 2008-09 model vehicles. The investigation is part of a two-year old (fledgling) endeavor initiated by the Ecology Center known as the Clean Car Campaign.

The CCC’s primary objective is to raise consumer and manufacturer awareness concerning, beginning with their official findings. Accordingly, the Ecology Center’s report ranks vehicles based on the potential threat they pose to human and environmental health. Ranked on a scale from 0 to 5 (0 being little-to-no threat), a vehicle’s score is tabulated by measuring the amount of toxic chemicals present in its interior. According to the report, the ten most toxic cars in descending order are [with score appearing beside vehicle model]:

Mitsubishi Eclipse Spider GT [4.7]


Suzuki Reno [4.2]

BMW 128i [3.9]

VW Beetle [3.9]

Lincoln Mark LT 4×4 [3.5]

Suzuki Forenza [3.5]

Mazda 6 Sport Value Edition [3.4]

Lincoln Navigator [3.3]

Kia Rondo LX [3.3]

Audi TT Coupe 2.0 [3.3]

When asked by Automotive News about the significance of these findings, Jeff Gearheart, who is spearheading the Clean Car Campaign, said, “Companies are starting to take this seriously.”

I beg your pardon, starting? Shouldn’t interior air quality already have been important? I mean, I know the fuel crisis is what’s on the front burner right now, but I don’t want a car that gets 40 mpg if the flame-retardant material used to upholster the seats is going to give me Black Lung.

[Full article & additional report results available at Automotive News]



Related posts:



Related posts:



2010 Mazda Mazdaspeed3

2010 Mazda Mazdaspeed3
It has a Mr. Hyde side to its grinning Dr. Jekyll look and once it takes control, you better be buckled up! The 2010 Mazda Mazdaspeed3 is on, the high-performance variant of the Mazda 3 five-door econobox. It is based on a two-box, five-door design which combines tossability and utility with its hatch that opens to hold a ton of cargo. Its interior has a nice business type setup with the sport matrix fabric that makes up some of the seating inserts on the well-bolstered front seats and door panels. Basically powered by a 2.3-liter DISI turbo powerplant that outputs 263-hp and 280 lb-ft of torque, gearing up to six-speed manual transmission. The Mazda Mazdaspeed3 is the one that deserves a two thumbs up!
2010 Mazda Mazdaspeed32010 Mazda Mazdaspeed3

2010 Mazda Mazdaspeed3
2010 Mazda Mazdaspeed3


Related posts:



Related posts: